University of Kansas

Electrical Engineering & Computer Science


EECS 562 - Lab - Spring 2026

GTAs:

Utsa Dey Sarkar utsa.deysarkar@ku.edu

Shadman Saqib shadman@ku.edu

Laboratory Location: Eaton 2060

Lab GTA Day/Time
Utsa Dey Sarkar  Monday 9:00-10:50
   
Utsa Dey Sarkar  Wed  9:00-10:50
   
 Shadman Saqib Wed 1:00-2:50
   
Utsa Dey Sarkar  Mon 1:00 - 2:50

EECS 562 – Syllabus- Dey Sarkar

EECS 562 – Syllabus- Saqib

EECS 562 – Lab Report Grading Rubric

EECS 562 – Introduction to Communication Systems Lab Schedule

Sample Laboratory Report

TIMS manual advanced

TIMS manual basic

Voltage (V) Conversion to dBu & dBV

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

LAB EXPERIMENTS

Watch this video before starting lab 1 Dive into the world of PicoScope 7

LAB 1 Pico Scope 7 Tutorial

LAB 2 Sampling, Quantizing & Encoding

LAB 3 Digital Bandpass Modulation

LAB 4 Amplitude Modulation

LAB 5 Frequency Modulation

LAB 6a Noise Analysis 1

LAB 6b Noise Analysis 2

LAB 7 OFDM

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Lab station rules

Lab report submission

AI Use

It is premissiable to use AI tools to correct and improve the English in your laboratory reports. Indicate in your report if you used an AI tool to to correct and improve the English. See the KU AI policy at https://ai.ku.edu/students  Microsoft 365 Copilot the approved AI chat tool at KU, it is available to all KU Lawrence students, faculty, staff, and researchers. You can access all available features of Copilot Chat by logging onto m365.cloud.microsoft with your KU online ID to access the features within your KU Microsoft 365 license. When you're signed into your KU account, your data and activity within Microsoft Copilot are significantly more protected than when using external generative AI tools (such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or others). This enhanced security is one of the key reasons Copilot is the approved generative AI tool for use across campus. Copilot can be used to check your solutions to homework problems.  Beware that Copilot can give wrong answers.   Treat information provided by Copilot as one source of information, verify any information given by AI tools with other sources.

Academic Integrity and Plagiarism

The department, school and university have very strict guidelines regarding academic misconduct. On tests work ALONE! Solve tests on your own, do not communicate with anyone else to get help on answers the test questions. If we need to have on-line tests; this is an honor system.  It is expected that as professionals you WILL act ethically.  It is expected that you will always act professionally and ethically. Obviously, copying is not allowed on exams. Obviously, copying is not allowed on exams. Students are expected to submit their own work on individual homework and projects. Lending or borrowing all or part of a simulation model or program from another student is not allowed. Students ARE allowed to borrow and modify any code on this class web site in their projects. Instances of cheating will result in a referral to the department chairman and the dean of engineering.
All sources in your written work (project reports) must be properly referenced; if you use a source from the literature or the idea of another for your work you must reference it. If you quote or copy a block of text, it must be cited and included in quotation marks (if a sentence or less in length) or in block quote style (if more than a sentence in length). If you paraphrase text (reword a phrase, sentence, or paragraph), you must also quote or blockquote followed by “[paraphrased]” in addition to proper citation. Figures taken from other sources must be referenced. I recommend that you take intermediate notes from which you write your own words. I strongly recommend that you not write in one window while displaying the work of others in another window; this is asking for trouble. “Unintentional” paraphrasing is also not an acceptable excuse for academic misconduct.

If you have any doubt, talk to me – inexperience in past writing or coming from an environment where plagiarism was permitted will not be an acceptable excuse for academic misconduct.

Modified with premission from James P.G. Sterbenz http://www.ittc.ku.edu/~jpgs/courses/eecs800/ and John Gauch

 

 


Author

Victor S. Frost, vsfrost@ku.edu